Source
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. U.S. Financial Data.
May 30, 2008.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/usfd/20080530/usfd.pdf
© 2008 Michael Cale
Sheets of information
Source
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. U.S. Financial Data.
May 30, 2008.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/usfd/20080530/usfd.pdf
© 2008 Michael Cale
© 2008 Michael Cale
By the early part of March, the threat of a disorderly adjustment was growing.
What we were observing in U.S. and global financial markets was similar to the classic pattern in financial crises. Asset price declines - triggered by concern about the outlook for economic performance - led to a reduction in the willingness to bear risk and to margin calls. Borrowers needed to sell assets to meet the calls; some highly leveraged firms were unable to meet their obligations and their counterparties responded by liquidating the collateral they held. This put downward pressure on asset prices and increased price volatility. Dealers raised margins further to compensate for heightened volatility and reduced liquidity. This, in turn, put more pressure on other leveraged investors. A self-reinforcing downward spiral of higher haircuts forced sales, lower prices, higher volatility, and still lower prices.
This dynamic poses a number of risks to the functioning of the financial system. It reduces the effectiveness of monetary policy, as the widening in spreads and risk premia worked to offset part of the reduction in the Fed Funds rate. Contagion spreads, transmitting waves of distress to other markets, from subprime to prime mortgages and even to agency mortgage-backed securities, to commercial mortgage-backed securities, and to corporate bonds and loans. In the current situation, effects were felt in the municipal and student loan markets.
The most important risk is systemic: if this dynamic continues unabated, the result would be a greater probability of widespread insolvencies, severe and protracted damage to the financial system and, ultimately, to the economy as a whole. This is not theoretical risk, and it is not something that the market can solve on its own. It carries the risk of significant damage to economic activity. Absent a forceful policy response, the consequences would be lower incomes for working families, higher borrowing costs for housing, education, and the expenses of everyday life, lower value of retirement savings, and rising unemployment.
Source
Timothy Geithner. Testimony before Senate Banking Committee.
April 3, 2008.
http://banking.senate.gov/public/_files/OpgStmtGeithner4308Testimony.pdf
© 2008 Michael Cale
"The building codes are stricter here, the taxes are higher," said Patricia Scott, a nurse. "I cross into Arizona and it's growing by leaps and bounds. We are the only community in the tri-state area that hasn't grown, and it's probably because we are in California."The story notes that an act of Congress, literally, is required for Needles to accomplish this feat.
Kohl's, Target and Sam's Club stand like beacons on the not-so-distant shore. Gas is almost a dollar a gallon cheaper across the river. Casinos beckon. Cities mushroom. And Needles slowly fades away.
Source:
David Kelly. Needles casts an envious eye elsewhere.
Los Angeles Times. May 26, 2008.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-needles26-2008may26,0,1537353,full.story
© 2008 Michael Cale
© 2008 Michael Cale

The advent of yet another red spot in Jupiter's turbulent atmosphere may support the idea that the planet is undergoing climate change.
Fluid-mechanics professor Philip Marcus of the University of California predicted in 2004 that rising temperatures would destabilize Jupiter's jet streams and give rise to more vortices.If only those folks on Jupiter would lay off the SUVs and coal-burning power plants, maybe they wouldn't have all these new hurricanes storms.
Source
Anne Casselman. Jupiter Gains New Red Spot.
National Geographic News. May 23, 2008.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/05/080523-jupiter-spot-photo.html
© 2008 Michael Cale
Argh. Does anybody associated with the MV-22 program ever get their info right? This is, again, the kind of PR screwup that looses a program credibility. Fix it.Using the word loose in place of the word lose - now that's the kind of PR screw-up that loses credibility!
© 2008 Michael Cale
© 2008 Michael Cale
Federal Reserve Board. TAF Auction Results.
Press Release. May 20, 2008.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20080520a.htm
© 2008 Michael Cale
Banks and securities firms, reeling from record losses resulting from the collapse of the mortgage securities market, are failing to acknowledge in their income statements at least $35 billion of additional writedowns included in their balance sheets, regulatory filings show.
Citigroup Inc. subtracted $2 billion from equity for the declining value of home-loan bonds in its quarterly report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2 without mentioning the deduction in the earnings statement 1
Complicit accounting rules allow the banks to writedown a bad asset (like a mortgage-backed security) and take the hit either on the income statement or the balance sheet.
Total asset impairment is estimated at over $300 billion. And it's not over yet.
The balance-sheet adjustments are in addition to $344 billion of writedowns and credit losses already reported on the income statements of more than 100 banks. 1
Banks are continuing to raise capital from wherever they can in order to stay solvent as their bad investments decline in value. They are selling ownership, cutting dividends, tapping government credit, and issuing new shares.
Jeffrey Rosenberg of Bank of America likens this writedown then raise-capital cycle to bathing -
"It's like shampooing: lather, rinse, repeat -- write down, raise capital, repeat,''Banks are shampooing, but it's shareholders and taxpayers that are taking a bath.
Source
1. Yalman Onaran. Banks Keep $35 Billion Markdown Off Income Statements.
Bloomberg. May 20, 2008.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aRict1yTdiBo
© 2008 Michael Cale

Source
Asha Bangalore. Index of Leading Indicators ñ Premature to Rule out Recession.
Northern Trust. May 19, 2008.
http://web-xp2a-pws.ntrs.com/content//media/attachment/data/econ_research/0805/document/dd051908.pdf
© 2008 Michael Cale
Recession is a reality, in our view, and yet it remains a hotly contested debate on Wall Street, simply because headline GDP was positive in the first quarter. Recessions officially started in Q1 1980 and Q3 1990, and both quarters saw a real GDP increase, not decline. The contraction came the following quarter, which is what we expect to happen this time. Not only that, the initial GDP report in the first quarter of 2001 (the onset of the last recession) was an estimated +2% at an annual rate in the Advance report, but has since been revised to -0.5%.
...in the last six months, aggregate hours worked have fallen at a 0.9% annual rate. This has always been a recession statistic and is actually more negative now than it was at the onset of the 1990 and 2001 downturns.1
Source
1. David Rosenberg et al. Macro viewpoint: What has surprised us ... and what hasn't
The Market Economist. May 16, 2008.
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/The%20Market%20Economist%2004%2016%2008.pdf
© 2008 Michael Cale
The Fed continues to hope that a slowing economy will subdue inflation. They have cut the target interest rate to a low level. At some point, they will have to raise it to fight accelerating inflation.
Note that the last time the Fed dropped the target rate significantly below the 2-year Treasury rate was during the recession of 2001.
The gray area on the chart indicates a recession. The official dates of the start of the current slowdown/recession will no be determined for some time. We may be in a gray area already; we just don't know it yet.

© 2008 Michael Cale
Inventory situation has gone from bad to worseKeep watching those inventories.
The Census Bureau’s all-inclusive inventory data were released for the first quarter and showed that the total number of single-family and condominium units that are vacant and for sale rose 4.5% or at a near-20% annual rate – for the second quarter in a row – to a record 2.277 million units...At current sales rates, it would take almost two years to absorb that excess inventory backlog. Alternatively, single-family housing starts will have to slide a further 25% from their already-depressed levels and test their all-time lows of around 500,000 and stay there for a good four years. Either way, we are probably much further away from the bottom in starts and prices than is generally perceived – judging by the intractable unsold inventory backlog, the downturn could well last through to 2010. 1
Source:
1. David Rosenberg. Macro viewpoint: Debunking five myths.
The Market Economist. May 9, 2008.
http://www.realclearmarkets.com/The%2520Market%2520Economist%252005%252009%252008.pdf
© 2008 Michael Cale
In recounting the origins of the bubble, SF Fed President Janet Yellen does acknowledge the correct root cause of the crisis:
- Inadequate risk management by many sophisticated institutions.
- Shortcomings in financial supervision and regulation.
How did such a situation come about? To my mind, it represents a rapid and disruptive unwinding of a bubble-like situation that had developed in credit markets over a number of years. At the time, many observers noted that the world appeared to be “awash in liquidity.” The “bubble” was characterized by very low long-term real interest rates. 1Liquidity created by the Fed and interest rates set by the Fed.
Significantly, the Fed was compelled to open the discount window to investment banks because of the outsized risks some took and their significant interconnectedness with the financial market infrastructure.1



Source
1. Yellen, Janet. Credit, Housing, Commodities, and the Economy.
Speech to the Chartered Financial Analyst Institute. May 13, 2008.
http://www.frbsf.org/news/speeches/2008/charts.pdf
2. Long Term Capital Management. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_term_capital_management.
3. Greenspan, Alan. Private-sector refinancing of the large hedge fund, Long-Term Capital Management.
U.S. House Committee on Banking and Financial Services. October 1, 1998.
http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/19981001.htm
Charts courtesy of Janet Yellen's presentation.
© 2008 Michael Cale
© 2008 Michael Cale
The housing (problem), that is what is really hurting us. The people who were buying big houses with lots of money, they don’t come.1

Chart courtesy of Stockcharts.com
Source
1. Brendan Buhler. True sign of the times: Vegas tips are slipping
Las Vegas Sun. May 8, 2008.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/may/08/true-sign-times-vegas-tips-are-slipping/
2. 2. Vivien Lou Chen. Countrywide Takes Away Home-Equity Credit Lines in Las Vegas
Bloomberg. May 6, 2008.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=adSiHtVyQXmc
© 2008 Michael Cale

[Democratic lawmakers] predict the public won't stand for painful cuts to schools and healthcare to close a shortfall the governor now pegs as high as $20 billion, and say anti-tax forces will ultimately have to accept that more revenue is needed to bring the state into the black.
Source:
1. Evan Halper. California tax proposals target beer-loving, pornography-watching yacht owners.
Los Angeles Times. May 9, 2008.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-taxes9-2008may09,0,5137016.story
© 2008 Michael Cale


Source: Monetary Trends St. Louis Fed.
© 2008 Michael Cale